In September 2018 a large AAA rated infrastructure lender and finance group, with about ₹91,000 crore of group debt, missed payments on its short term paper. Within weeks the whole non bank lending sector was short of money. Debt funds stopped rolling over commercial paper. Borrowing costs for NBFCs jumped. Several housing finance stocks lost more than half their value within months, and the slowdown spread to real estate, vehicles and consumer durables. All of it started with one institution that could not refinance three month paper.
Eight years later the same system looks very different. Bank gross NPAs are at a multi decade low. Credit is growing at its fastest pace in years. And on 7 October 2026 the RBI raised the repo rate for the first time since 2023. Good balance sheets, fast loan growth and rising rates: that combination is exactly where a credit cycle needs watching.
Bank gross NPA ratio, March 2026, from 2.3% a year earlier
RBI FSR, 30 Jun 2026
Non food bank credit growth, Aug 2026, from 10.2% a year earlier
RBI, 30 Sep 2026
GNPA of the NBFC stress test sample, March 2026; 2.8% projected for March 2027
RBI FSR, 30 Jun 2026
Repo rate after the first hike since 2023
RBI, 7 Oct 2026
How India's credit cycle works
A credit cycle has four phases. They overlap and the lengths vary, but the order rarely changes.
- Expansion: rates are low or falling, banks and NBFCs lend freely, credit growth picks up, businesses invest, jobs and consumption grow, earnings improve and lenders' stocks do well.
- Peak: credit growth is high and standards slip. Riskier borrowers get loans. Collateral such as property and pledged shares looks safe because prices are up. Leverage builds quietly.
- Contraction: the RBI tightens, or a credit event hits. Lending slows, the weakest borrowers and lenders crack first, investment pulls back and earnings slow.
- Clean up: bad loans are recognised and provided for. Bank profits bottom out. Balance sheets heal and a new cycle can start.
Where is India now? Credit growth of 18.8% with gross NPAs at 1.8% and a central bank that has just started hiking reads like late expansion. That is not a forecast of trouble. It is a reason to watch the quality of new lending more closely than the headline profits.
RBI, Sectoral deployment of bank credit, August 2026 (released 30 Sep 2026)The NBFC sector, India's shadow banking system
Non banking financial companies (NBFCs) lend but do not hold a banking licence. Most cannot take demand deposits, so they fund themselves with bank loans, bonds and commercial paper. India has thousands of them, from very large listed lenders to small microfinance institutions.
NBFCs serve the borrowers banks find harder to reach: used truck and tractor buyers, gold loan customers, microfinance groups, self employed home buyers and small businesses. That makes them central to rural and small business credit, and it makes their funding the weak point of the system.
The RBI regulates them under a scale based framework introduced in October 2021. NBFCs sit in a base, middle, upper or top layer depending on size and risk. The upper layer, named by the RBI each year, faces rules close to those for banks: tighter capital, governance and disclosure. The point of the design is simple. A lender that is large enough to cause a 2018 style crisis is supervised like a bank.
RBI, Scale Based Regulation: A Revised Regulatory Framework for NBFCs, 22 Oct 2021The 2018 NBFC crisis, a case study in credit cycle reversal
The lender that defaulted in 2018 borrowed short, through commercial paper and bonds, and lent long, to infrastructure projects that take years to pay back. When short term money stopped coming, it could not roll its debt. Two things made it a system event:
- The rating was wrong until it was not. The group carried the highest ratings until weeks before it defaulted. Ratings tell you about the past. Funding markets tell you about today.
- Contagion ran through debt funds. Funds that held its paper took losses and faced redemptions. To protect themselves they stopped buying commercial paper from other NBFCs too. Lenders with nothing to do with infrastructure suddenly could not refinance.
In June 2019 a large housing finance company followed: short term funding, long dated home loans and governance problems, ending in default and, in November 2019, the RBI superseding its board. Two failures in nine months taught the same lesson. In India's credit system, the most persistent risk is an asset liability mismatch at a lender that depends on market funding.
- A large AAA rated infrastructure lender defaults
Short term paper cannot be rolled. The government supersedes its board in October.
- Debt funds pull back from NBFC paper
Funding costs jump across the sector; the RBI adds liquidity.
- A large housing finance company defaults
In November 2019 the RBI supersedes its board and refers it to insolvency.
- Scale based regulation for NBFCs
Base, middle, upper and top layers; bank like rules for the largest.
- Risk weights raised 25 points
On unsecured consumer credit and on bank loans to NBFCs.
- NBFC risk weights restored
Effective 1 April 2025.
- Repo raised to 5.50%
With bank GNPA at 1.8% and credit growing 18.8%.
Worked example, an NBFC balance sheet under a funding shock
Take a hypothetical mid sized NBFC with a ₹10,000 crore loan book. Equity is ₹2,000 crore. Borrowing is ₹8,000 crore: ₹5,000 crore of bank loans and bonds of three to five years, and ₹3,000 crore of commercial paper that matures every three months. Its loans run three years on average, so roughly ₹830 crore of principal comes back each quarter.
- Normal times: the ₹3,000 crore of paper is rolled every quarter at, say, 7.5%. Nobody notices.
- Rates rise: commercial paper reprices to 10%. The extra cost is 2.5% on ₹3,000 crore, ₹75 crore a year. On a book earning 14% and costing 8.5%, the spread is about ₹550 crore a year, so profit falls but the company survives.
- The market shuts: nobody will roll the paper. The company has to find ₹3,000 crore in 90 days while only about ₹830 crore of loans come back. The gap is roughly ₹2,170 crore. Equity of ₹2,000 crore cannot fill it, because equity is already lent out. It has to stop lending, sell loans at a discount or default.
The lesson in one line. The second scenario costs money. The third ends companies. That is why the share of short term funding against short term assets matters more than the profit line when you read an NBFC.
NPA cycle, how bad loans move through the system
The non performing asset (NPA) cycle is the rise and fall of bad loans. India's last full cycle ran roughly from 2010 to 2022:
- Around 2008 to 2012: banks lent heavily to infrastructure, power, steel and real estate. Project costs overran and promoters took on too much debt.
- 2012 to 2015: projects stalled. Loans were restructured again and again, which pushed the problem forward. Bad loans grew but stayed partly hidden.
- 2015 to 2018: the RBI's Asset Quality Review forced banks to recognise bad loans. The gross NPA ratio peaked at about 11.2% in March 2018. Public sector banks needed fresh capital.
- 2018 to 2022: the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code of 2016 started resolving large cases. Balance sheets were cleaned and the ratio fell to 5.9% by March 2022, then kept falling to 1.8% by March 2026.
- Mar 201811.2%
- Mar 20225.9%
- Mar 20233.9%
- Mar 20242.8%
- Mar 20252.3%
- Mar 20261.8%
Gross NPA ratio of scheduled commercial banks. RBI Financial Stability Reports (July 2022 to June 2026) and Report on Trend and Progress of Banking 2017 to 18. Baseline projection for March 2028: 1.9% (FSR June 2026).
Investor read of the NPA cycle. Banks that are provisioning heavily report low profits but are building clean balance sheets. Once recognition peaks and provision cover is high, credit costs fall and earnings recover, often for years. The reverse also holds: when NPAs are at a record low, credit costs have little room to fall further, and the next surprise in bank earnings is more likely to be on the cost side.
Credit growth as a leading economic indicator
The RBI publishes bank credit data every fortnight and sector wise deployment every month. Year on year credit growth is one of the best live reads on economic momentum. Rough bands:
- Above 15%: strong expansion. Good for lenders and cyclicals, and the point at which the RBI starts asking about loan quality.
- 10% to 15%: steady growth.
- Below 8%: slowdown. Watch guidance from consumer and capital goods companies.
- A sharp fall from a high level: often the first sign of stress, before it shows up in NPAs.
In the 12 months to August 2026 non food credit growth almost doubled, from 10.2% to 18.8%, with industry credit up 18.2%. Some of that reflects working capital needs when crude and import costs rise. Some is genuine investment. The split matters, and the monthly sector data shows it.
Regulation moves this cycle too. In November 2023 the RBI raised risk weights on unsecured consumer credit and on bank loans to NBFCs by 25 percentage points, making that lending more expensive in capital terms. Bank lending to NBFCs slowed sharply. In February 2025 the RBI restored the NBFC risk weights from 1 April 2025. When the regulator leans against a segment, credit growth in that segment slows within a few quarters.
RBI, Review of risk weights on bank exposures to NBFCs, 25 Feb 2025Reading lender stocks through the cycle
NSE's financial indices let you see the cycle in prices. In the 12 months to 9 October 2026, a year of record credit growth and a late turn to tightening, Nifty PSU Bank rose 7.4% on a P/E of 7.3. Nifty Private Bank fell 1.1%. Nifty Bank fell 1.7% on a P/E of 13.1. Nifty Financial Services, which adds NBFCs, insurers and market intermediaries, fell 6.6%. The Nifty 50 fell 10.6%.
- Nifty PSU Bank+7.36%
- Nifty Private Bank-1.07%
- Nifty Bank-1.66%
- Fin Services ex Bank-2.80%
- Nifty Financial Services-6.57%
- Nifty 50-10.57%
Price change, 9 Oct 2025 to 9 Oct 2026. P/E on 9 Oct 2026: PSU Bank 7.3, Private Bank 16.8, Bank 13.1, Financial Services 15.3, Nifty 50 19.3. Source: NSE index data.
Lenders held up better than the index because their earnings grew. The low P/Es are the market's way of saying it does not fully trust the cycle to last. When rates rise, lenders that fund themselves with deposits usually reprice loans faster than deposits for a while. Lenders that fund themselves in the bond and commercial paper market feel the higher cost sooner. That difference is the first thing to check when the RBI turns.
RupeeCase strategies do not run a credit cycle model or read RBI credit data. They rank stocks on price momentum and rebalance on a fixed calendar, so lenders enter when their prices lead and leave when they lag. The protection against a credit shock is structural, not predictive. The Allcap Multi Asset card keeps a fixed 10% in debt and 10% in gold. The Dynamic Asset Allocator keeps a 35% equity core and uses a 40% switch between equity and debt and a 25% switch between equity and gold, driven by a momentum and risk signal and rebalanced every 3 weeks (CAGR 45.18%, Sharpe 2.32, max drawdown -10.57%; Model, back tested, as of 27 Apr 2026).
Common mistakes
- Trusting the rating. The 2018 lender was rated at the top until weeks before default. Watch funding costs and maturities.
- Reading low NPAs as low risk. NPAs lag lending by two to three years. The loans that go bad in 2028 are being written in 2026.
- Ignoring the liability side. For an NBFC, how it borrows matters as much as whom it lends to.
- Treating all financials as one trade. In the same 12 months, Nifty PSU Bank rose 7.4% and Nifty Financial Services fell 6.6%.
- Assuming a rate hike hurts every lender equally. Deposit funded and market funded lenders react differently, at least at first.
MythA AAA rating means the lender cannot fail.
FactIn September 2018 a group rated at the top until weeks earlier defaulted on short term paper, and the funding freeze spread to the whole NBFC sector. Ratings describe the past. Funding markets describe today.
Questions readers ask
Are NBFCs safer now than in 2018?
On the RBI's numbers, the sector is better capitalised and better supervised. The NBFC stress test sample had a GNPA ratio of 2.4% and capital adequacy of 22.3% in March 2026, and the largest lenders now sit in the upper layer of scale based regulation. The RBI still flags a weak tail: under its baseline stress test, 7 NBFCs could fall below the 15% minimum capital ratio. Safer as a system does not mean every lender is safe.
Is 18.8% credit growth a warning sign?
Not by itself. It is a reason to look closer. Fast credit growth with falling NPAs is normal early in a cycle. Later in a cycle, fast growth in unsecured loans or to stretched borrowers is what turns into the next NPA wave. Check which segments are growing, not just the total.
How does a repo rate hike reach an NBFC?
Through its borrowing costs. Bank loans linked to benchmarks reprice within months, and new commercial paper and bonds are priced off a higher yield curve right away. If the NBFC cannot pass the cost on to borrowers quickly, its spread narrows. If funding markets also turn nervous, as in 2018, availability matters more than price.
Rules and figures in this module were last verified on 12 Oct 2026. Tax and regulatory rules change; check the source before acting.